2 posts tagged “tv”
The question of what to review tonight is a vexed one with the traditional competitive scheduling of the TV moguls leading to a frustrating choice in the prime 9pm slot.
Spooks (BBC1, 9pm)
Spooks has been even more ridiculous than usual this series with increasingly implausible plots against the state and the traditional death of a character's spouse (a hallmark of the show since the bomb blast at the end of series one that killed of the whole of Matthew McFaddyen's fictional family). But ultimately the show is a rollocking adventure show seasoned with a pinch of violence and painted over with a gloss of overly sexy stars. Tonight's episode is a good one (I was unable to stop myself from pigging out on two episodes last week) with Ruth (a key team member) being framed in a conspiracy and having to leave for the good of the service. It's a gripping end to her on again/off again romance with head of section, Harry Pierce. The tension between them has a rather old fashioned Brief Encounter vibe to it and is a change from the more blantant couplings that usually grace BBC1 post watershed. Having said that the series is teetering on tedious when it comes to its setting up of a relationship between traumatised hero of the piece, Adam Carter, and his son's nanny. In this episode, she descends the stairs in the middle of the night to see him drinking whiskey, shirtless and sad. It's a moment for the women in the audience but its done in a rather heavy handed way.
The Death Of A President (More4, 9pm)
In this fictionalised docudrama we are treated to the death of George W Bush, assassinated as he walks the rope line. Cobbled together from archive footage and cleverly edited original scenes, the film is by all accounts an impressive if queasy viewing experience. I'm not sure if I will take the time to review it this evening - there's something unpleasant about allowing wishful thinking to speculate about the death of another human being. It seems like a rather morbid and distasteful liberal fantasy given full reign. Apparently the result of the assassination is the inauguration of President Cheney and an even worse fate for America and the world. Is is really appropriate for film makers to speculate in this way? Propaganda of any kind is unpleasant and you have to question whether More4 would deign to show a film where Tony Blair was brutally gunned down. We may not like these leaders but it is their use of violence that is most frequently criticised - surely advocating their murder (which is essentially what this film does) is hypocritical.
Nuremberg: The Nazis on Trial (BBC2, 9pm)
Rudolph Hess is the subject of tonight's episode of this ongoing series. Of all the Nazi leaders, he is probably the most interesting and mysterious. Captured in Scotland (by a plucky farmer with a pitchfork), the reason for his flight to the Allies has never really been clear - he claimed Hitler had sent him to broker a peace deal but was denounced by his former friend as a traitor. He then spent the rest of his days in Spandau prison - ending up as its last prisoner. This series is worth a watch, with some fine performances in earlier episodes, but there is a bigger reason for paying attention. In today's society, where our laws are becoming increasingly draconian and our government's have taken to detaining 'terrorists' without trial, it is worth considering how we dealt with some of history's greatest criminals - public trial with the right to a defence. Nuremberg was by no means a perfect or entirely fair process but it was a far cry from secret prisons and "special rendition". Does it ever strike you that the methods advocated by our government in the war on terror are more reminiscent of the Nazi approach to defence than our history of the right to a fair trial?
The new Robin Hood is filled with allusions to current politics - stricter new laws created for the public good "the law is under threat" as one the Sherrif's men claims at the beginning of the first episode; an unpopular war (the crusades) being waged abroad, the country standing "shoulder to shoulder with Rome" in the words of Keith Allen's Sherrif of Nottingham. But these references are a little heavy handed, ultimately this is adventure series filled with matinee idols and baddies you can boo. It's a glitzy production full of anachronisms which critics have been quick to pick up on. But viewers want a fantastic tea time romp and this provides it, with a heroic Robin [Jonas Armstrong] (who looks a little too young), a gruff voiced and villainous Guy of Gisborne and Keith Allen chewing the scenery as if it were big chunks of ham. My favourite character from the first
is Robin's valet Much, who injects welcome comedy into the drama while clearly suffering from post traumatic stress as a result of his time in the holy lands. Marian (Lucy Griffiths) is a little disappointing (despite her skill with a bow and a throwing knife) but there's definitely scope for improvement. Robin is, as usual, the straight man of the piece and we're bound to watch week after week for Allen's hyperbolically villainous turn - heroes are always the harder parts to play (look at Alan Richman compared to Kevin Costner in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves). In all, I say ignore the professional critics - this is a fantastic family show which has much to offer despite its silliness. The story of Robin Hood is mythical not historical, so there's no reason not to fill it with magic.Robin Hood, BBC1, Saturdays, 7pm
A positive review from the Guardian
Mixed feelings from the Newsnight Review panel